We've long known about the lay leadership program that Bishop Galante has been planning for the Diocese of Camden. In this brief article, we read about the signing ceremony with the College of St. Elizabeth. In the past, Galante has cited an alleged priest shortage as a rationale for the need for lay "ministers, but he continues to send priests away for "training," as military chaplains, and has even forced retirements and sent priests he disliked  to treatment centers or to different dioceses. Usually the priests who are sent away are of the most orthodox ones in the Camden Diocese. This hardly seems accidental. Of course Galante also says that church attendance is down, and that we need to consolidate (close) our churches, but with fewer churches, wouldn't it follow that fewer priests would be needed? The real agenda here is instituting a liberal lay leadership program and pushing for married and, probably, for female priests.

We have long known of two lay men who want to be diocesan priests here--both of whom Rome recently rejected, presumably because they are married--who are still taking seminary classes down at Baltimore's "pink palace," St. Mary's. Not only this, but to the best of our knowledge, both are living in housing paid for by the Diocese of Camden, and one is currently employed by the Diocese. The latter individual I spoke with myself a couple months ago, and he informed me that Bishop Galante asked him if he was interested in being a priest within minutes of meeting him, full aware of his age (he appeared to be in his late 50s), evangelical protestant religious background, poor health, and marital status. If Rome has told these men "no," then why are they still training for the priesthood and, last we heard, still living in diocesan housing? Your guess is a good as mine.