June 2008 Archives

IMG_0087

June 28, 2008: About 16 picketers stood outside the St. Pius X Spiritual Life Center today to let the bishop know that they want to keep their houses of God open. Sixteen people at a moment's notice, and on a lovely Saturday afternoon? Not bad.

Instead of standing outside with a sign, my son Theo and I went in to the picnic and were warmly greeted by a Sr. Judith. They even had face painting, a large selection of food, and games for the kids.

 IMG_0080

As you can see from the pictures, we took advantage of the face painting.


IMG_0090IMG_0098

There were only about two dozen people in attendance. I had expected quite a bit more, and I suspect they did, too.

IMG_0093IMG_0091IMG_0072

We brought a bouquet of Gerber daisies with six little cards attached with prayers we would say on each. We also brought two cards, one on behalf of the campaign (and me personally) and one from my four-year-old son. My card had a picture of the Good Shepherd on it. On the inside it said (as I recall--I didn't photocopy it),

Dear Bishop Galante,
      On the occasion of your birthday, we offer this Spiritual Bouquet of prayers to you. As always, we sincerely pray that you be a true shepherd to the diocese, that you do God's will rather than your own, and that you spare our churches. We pray that you experience a conversion of heart...

It also said on the opposite page, as I remember,
A Happy and Blessed Birthday
Praying for your soul and those of the whole diocese

Theo's card said, "Happy Birthday" on one side and, "Please don't take my church away" on the other. (In the picture, his card is the one rolled up like a scroll.)

Spiritual Bouquet

Theo and I presented these to the bishop, who graciously received them. We asked him for his blessing, which he gave. He seemed to be in a very good mood, and it seems he will be on vacation at his beach house for about a month so that may be the reason.

IMG_0095

The picnic was open to friends and family of diocesan employees. I was never asked anything but my first name. Needless to say, no one knew who I was. The point, though, was for Bishop Galante to know we were there and that we will continue to make our presence known until our churches are safe. We continue to pray for his conversion and that he changes his mind and heart, and that he conform himself to the will of God. My family is depending on nothing less than this miracle.

IMG_0077

SS Peter and Paul

From the church bulletin 6/29: "Treasures from our Tradition"

Today is an exceptional event on our calendar. The Thirteenth Sunday of Ordinary Time is eclipsed by a solemnity honoring two saints who didn't spend much time together in their earthly ministry, and who have distinct feasts so they probably don't mind sharing this one. Yet each suffered a similar fate in the same city, Rome, during the persecution of the Emperor Nero. Nero probably ordered the destruction of many of the residential neighborhoods in service to his building projects, and when the homeless began to look for someone to blame for the fires, Nero targeted the Christians. Soon, Peter was crucified, upside down, on the Vatican hill. Excavations (called scavi) under the Vatican basilica have proven the authenticity of his burial place near the place of his death. Paul, a Roman citizen, was later granted a swifter execution by the sword, and is remembered at a vast basilica on the city's outskirts.

Peter and Paul were just about polar opposites. Peter rough and ready, Paul poetic and polished. Peter carried burden of regret for his denials, Paul had his own issues with which he struggled. Peter leapt over barriers to go to the Gentiles, Paul strove with and surrendered to the same call. True, they spent very little time together in this life, but the same Spirit filled their hearts and by their witness changed the face of the earth.

Come Holy Spirit

From the bulletin this week, 6/29:

"Holy Spirit, give me courage to fight the evil I must battle today."

Prayer to the Holy Spirit in Favor of the Church:

O Holy Spirit, Creator, be propitious to the Catholic Church; by Your heavenly power make it strong and secure against attacks of its enemies, and renew in charity and grace the spirit of Your servants whom you have annointed, that they may glorify You and the Father and His only-begotten on, Jesus Christ Our Lord. Amen.
We at St. Mary's Malaga are privileged to have Eucharistic Adoration each week for several days. This week, being a First Friday, Adoration will go through Friday night. Mass will be at 7:30pm. Confessions will be before mass. On the First Saturday there will be Fatima devotions.

I think it's amazing that every time I pop in for adoration after work in the evening, the church has never been empty. Usually there are several other people there, even late at night. Truly St. Mary's is a faithful parish. Let's continue to use our times before the Lord as opportunities to pray for the bishop--that he do the holy Will of God, for the diocese, for all priests of the diocese and especially Fr. Romanowski, for vocations to the priesthood and religious life, and for St. Mary's.
The Feast of SS. Peter and Paul (The Year of St. Paul)

We're not forgetting the exalted vocation of St. Peter during our prayer and study of St. Paul's life and inspired epistles. The Feast this weekend emphasizes the eternal place of St. Peter and his successors in the Church. The present successor and his predecessor, Pope John Paul II, Servant of God, are spiritual guides in the constant plan to give honor and glory to God and thus to save souls. This plan must be followed in order to stay on the safe road to eternity. At Cesarea Philipi Jesus questioned the Apostles about Himself: "Who do people say that I am?" Some say John the Baptist, some Elias, others Jeremias or one of the other prophets. Jeus saith to them: "Whom do you say that I am?" Simon Peter answered and said: "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." And Jesus answered and said to him: Blessed are thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in Heaven." (St. Matthew 16:13-17). Heed these words. They are for every one of us. These words touch our hearts as they touched the heart of St. Peter, the poor, uneducated fisherman. They touch our hearts becaus they show us the exact way to heaven when they are followed by what Our Lord says next: "And I say to thee: That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon the earth, it shall be bound also in heaven; and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth it shall be loosed in heaven." (St. Matthew 16:18-19).

These words are applied every day in our relationship with Almighty God. The Church shows us the way to God. St. Peter and St. Paul had no trouble seeing the Lord in all things and they cooperated in teaching that in season and out of season. Let us do the same because our souls' salvation depend on our strict allegiance to the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church.

Praise be Jesus Christ!
Now and Forever
Fr. Jerome Charles Romanowski

What do you think?

I know that this contributor is not the only person who feels the "process" to determine which parishes would close and which ones would remain open was significantly flawed; that basically, it was biased and politically motivated. The argument goes that generally those who were "in" with the bishop got to keep their parishes open. I personally don't know since I wasn't a party to the discussions, and I don't know too much about diocesan politics. But the evidence is there. What do you think?

This is what was submitted to Save St. Marys yesterday, 6/23, by email:


Been doing some checking and researching and am attaching information I put together from the 2008 Diocesan Directory and several Issues of the Star Herald. 
I find it interesting that most of the members of the Bishop's committees who held the fates of our parishes in their hands, have just about kept all their Parishes open.
 
CAMDEN DIOCESE PRESBYTERIAL COUNCIL AND PARISHES TO BE KEPT OPEN OR CLOSED a/o 4/3/08

Most Rev Joseph A. Galante, Presider

Rev. Joseph E. Wallace, Exec Secretary (Christ the King-Haddonfield) OPEN, Stand Alone Parish

Rev. Thomas S. Donio, Recording Secretary (Nativity-Franklinville) OPEN

    - Merge Nativity (Franklinville), St. Bridget (Glassboro) and St. Catherine (Clayton)

      with worship sites at Nativity and St. Bridget (for Spanish community)

EX OFFICIO MEMBERS:


Rev. Msgr. John H. Burton (St. Isidore-Vineland) OPEN

      - merge with Sacred Heart (Vineland) as secondary worship site

Rev. Msgr. Peter M. Joyce (Incarnation-Mantua) OPEN - Stand Alone Parish

Msgr. Robert T. McDermott (St. Joe's Pro Cathedral-Camden) OPEN

-merge with St. Cecilia's (Pennsauken) & St. Veronica (Delair) (both closing)


Rev. Msgr. Roger E. McGrath (St. Pius X-Cherry Hill) OPEN

  -     Merge with Holy Rosary (closed)

Rev. Terry Odien (St. Peter Celestine-Cherry Hill) OPEN

  -      Merge with Queen of Heaven (closed)

Rev. William Weiksnar, OFM (Immaculate Conception-Bridgeton) OPEN

Merge St. Teresa of Avila (Bridgeton), Immaculate Conception (Bridgeton), St. Michael (Cedarville) and St. Mary (Rosenhayn-closing) with primary worship sites at  Immaculate Conception, particularly for the Hispanic community, and at St. Michael

Rev. Msgr. William A. Brennan (St. Pius X-Cherry Hill) OPEN

merge with Holy Rosary (closed)
 

APPOINTED MEMBERS:

Rev. Msgr. Joseph V. DiMauro (St. Patrick's-Woodbury) OPEN

Merge St. Patrick's (Woodbury), St. Matthew (National Park) and Most Holy Redeemer (Westville Grove-closing) with primary worship site at St. Patrick and secondary site at St. Matthew

Rev. Msgr. Thomas J. McIntyre (Star of the Sea- Cape May) OPEN, Stand Alone Parish

 

Rev. Msgr. Thomas J. Morgan (St. Thomas Moore-Cherry Hill) OPEN

Cluster St. Thomas Moore and St. Mary's (both open)

Rev. Msgr. Victor S. Muro (Immaculate Heart-Vineland) CLOSED

Merge Immaculate Heart with St. Francis of Assisi (Vineland) with worship site at St. Francis

Rev. Thomas A. Newton (St. Peter Celestine-Cherry Hill) OPEN

Merge St. Peter Celestine and Queen of Heaven (Cherry Hill - closing) with worship site at St. Peter Celestine

Rev. Msgr. William Quinn (St. Paul-Stone Harbor) OPEN

Merge Maris Stella (Avalon) with St. Paul with the primary worship site at Maris Stella and a secondary worship site at St. Paul

Rev. Msgr. Russell L. Rock (St. Maria Goretti-Runnemede) CLOSED

Merge St. Teresa (Runnemede) and St. Maris Goretti (Runnemede) with worship site at St. Teresa

Rev. Msgr. Patrick M. Tierney (Maris Stella-Avalon) OPEN

Merge with St. Paul (Stone Harbor) with primary worship site at Maris Stella and secondary site at St. Paul

Rev. Msgr. James R. Tracy (St. Charles Borromeo-Sicklerville) OPEN, Stand Alone Parish

 

ELECTED MEMBERS:

REPRESENTATIVES BY ORDINATION SENIORITY

Rev. Vincent G. Carpinelli-Group 1 (Our Lady of Lourdes-Glassboro) OPEN

Merge Our Lady of Lourdes (Glassboro) and Queen of Peace (Pitman) with primary worship site at Our Lady of Lourdes and a secondary site at Queen of Peace

Rev. Joseph D. Wallace-Group 2 (Christ the King-Haddonfield) OPEN, Stand Alone Parish

Rev. James A. Casadia-Group 3 (St. Ann's-Wildwood) OPEN

Merge St. Ann (Wildwood) with Assumption (Wildwood Crest) with the worship site at St. Ann.  Assumption will continue as a secondary site for summer tourists

councilofparishes.net

Have you been to the Council of Parishes' website yet? Those who support the movement are welcome to join. The website was created in May but content is still being put up, slowly but surely, as people contribute it. This site is meant for networking, announcing events, and supporting the preservation of South Jersey's many wonderful Catholic churches.

The Council of Parishes of Southern New Jersey was formed in May 2008 after Bishop Galante unveiled his plan to cut in half the number of parishes in the Diocese of Camden. Many of the churches Galante seeks to close are historic in nature and therefore small. Since Galante prefers megachurches and desires to rid the diocese of its rich Catholic history and culture, the Council naturally opposes the unnecessary and harmful merge of our parishes and closure of our churches. The Council currently represents 27 parishes throughout the Diocese of Camden.

Answering to sin

From catechism:

363 Q. Are we bound tohonor and obey others than our parents?
         A. We are bound to honor and obey our bishops, pastors, magistrates, teachers, and other lawful superiors.

362 Q. What are we commanded by the Fourth Commandment?
         A. We are commanded by the Fourth Commandment to honor, love, and obey our parents in all that is not sin.

Explanation:
"In all that is not sin," because if our parents or superiors, being wicked, bid us do things that we know to be certainly sinful, then we must not obey them under any circumstances. God will not excuse us for doing wrong because we were commanded. But if, on the contrary, we are forced in spite of our resistance to do the sinful act, then not we but they have to answer for the sin....

364 Q. Have parents and superiors any duties toward those who are under their charge?
         A. It is the duty of parents and superiors to take good care of all under their charge and give them proper direction and example.

Explanation:
It is so much their duty that God will hold them responsible for it, and punish them for neglecting it...


The bishop is now admitting to wanting to change the culture of the Church. What we are facing as the faithful is an attempt to change the fundamental nature of the Church, the Church as we know it, and how it functions, particularly on a local level. We must fight this--moreover we are obligated to by virtue of our baptism. It is a matter of our eternal destiny and the loss of many souls.

Snippet:


Over the next year, South Jersey's Catholics will experience a wave of dramatic -- and sometimes traumatic -- change.
Advertisement Long-beloved churches will close. Parishes that helped define a spiritual community will disappear. And parochial schools that once rang with the sounds of children will sit silent.

Those losses -- which some observers compare to a death in the family -- will be controversial casualties in an ongoing campaign by the Diocese of Camden.

The diocese -- faced with a worsening priest shortage, aging congregations and shifting demographics -- plans to slash its parishes from 124 to 66. And Camden Bishop Joseph Galante said surviving parishes will see a culture change, as they are revitalized with an influx of ministries and new members.


I have only skimmed the article, but the title looks promising. Please email me any commentary you may have. I've been getting plenty of great contributions of late, so keep them coming.

Read it here

Priest Increase of 180% Since Diocese of Camden Began in 1937.

This should put in perspective the spin Galante, McGrath, vollmer, and Walton are putting on things. This crisis isn't about any of their stated reasons. They clearly have another agenda. Here's what was submitted to me today, by email.


Interesting statistics on the history of the Diocese of Camden:

When the Diocese was formed in 1937, there were already 80
parishes or mission churches, which were served by 75 diocesan
priests and 11 religious priests
or 1.075 priests per parish
or mission
. There was not a single Catholic human services
institution, even though there was a much greater need than
today. And yet the Diocese grew at a phenomenal rate.

By contrast, today, according to the Diocesan website we have
241 priests serving in the diocese (including 43 religious order
and 26 extern priests) or 1.944 priests per parish (not
considering the 13 diocesan priests serving outside the diocese,
plus around 100 retired priests, many of whom are still somewhat
active). And yet Bishop Galante is saying there is a priest
shortage and the diocese cannot staff today's 124 parishes.

That means that since 1937, the number of parishes or missions
have increased by 55%
(from 80 to 124), while
the number of
priests has increased by 180%
(from 86 to 241) and
somehow Bishop Galante is claiming a priest shortage as one of
the reasons for closing parishes.
Even if the 51 priests they
project might die or retire by 2015 do, in fact, die or retire
by that date and even if there are no new ordinations between]
now and then, the priest/parish or mission ratio would still
go from 1.075 in 1937 to 1.532 in 2015, a more than 50% increase.


The bottom line is we do not have a priest shortage and we will
not have a priest shortage in 2015 unless Bishop Galante
continues getting rid of priests and driving away potential
seminarians, which he seems determined to do.

"Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of
My pasture!" says the Lord. Therefore thus says the Lord God of
Israel against the shepherds who feed My people: "You have
scattered My flock, driven them away, and not attended to them.
Behold, I will attend to you for the evil of your doings," says
the Lord. "But I will gather the remnant of My flock out of
all countries where I have driven them, and bring them back to
their folds; and they shall be fruitful and increase. I will
set up shepherds over them who will feed them; and they shall
fear no more, nor be dismayed, nor shall they be lacking,"
says the Lord. Jeremiah 23:1-4

Let us pray fervently:
"Save Your people, and bless Your inheritance;
Shepherd them also, and bear them up forever." Psalm 28:9

Over here at Save St. Mary's we admit to getting a kick out of the continuing technical ineptitude over at the diocese. I admit I personally am not a techie by any stretch of the imagination, but you'd figure the Diocese of Camden could do a little better. I received this email last night:

The Diocese put very prominent links to the Pat Ciarrocchi interview all over their sites today: the Star Herald, the Diocese homepage and the Gathering God's Gifts page. But what's great is that every link to the video is broken! You should suggest they link to you instead.

Not the first time the diocese has had a "technical glitch." As I said, I know nothing about web development/design, but even I can put up a link correctly. Maybe they'll fix the links when they see this post.
Yesterday morning at 8:15 am Bishop Galante was on Newsmakers with Pat Ciarrocchi on CBS 3. Here are some of Bishop Galante's assertions, with comments and clarifications from savestmarys.net as well as some summaries of sentiments expressed by Leah Vassallo and Bob Walsh (COP) yesterday.

1. The bishop says that families, young families, are moving off barrier islands and therefore there isn't the need for parishes and schools that there once was.
  • Where does he get this information from? If families are moving off the islands, then why are so many schools growing and building?

2. He said twice that he's responded to letters written to him.
  • No he hasn't. He certainly hasn't responded to mine. I know people who have written him countless times and have to date received no response, not even a form letter. For those lucky enough to get a letter, it is only a form letter and usually does not address their concerns.

3. He said that people are moving from "urban centers" in South Jersey.
  • What "urban centers"? Camden and Atlantic City? South Jersey doesn't really have "urban centers" in the way other areas do. The truth is that Galante wants to close churches throughout the diocese in places that are urban, suburban, and rural. Closures ("mergers") are widespread across the diocese, despite the environment. The bishop is using national trends to justify actions that are local, even if the general national trends do not apply to our particular region. In fact, Bishop Galante wishes to close churches in areas whose populations are growing. This is opportunism, pure and simple, and the diocese uses whatever rationale seems expedient at the time.

4. He said "the Eucharist is the center of our faith and without priests we cannot have the Eucharist."
  • This is an interesting statement considering that Bishop Galante (1) discourages priestly vocations (see below) and (2) holds up as models for future Catholic churches in South Jersey a protestant church (Gloucester County Community Church) and a radically liberal Catholic megachurch in Naples, FL that has publicly espoused heretical views about the Eucharist and other matters of faith. LINK

5. The bishop said we need a "new springtime" in the Church of South Jersey (as he calls it), "a renewal of our faith and our practice." We need outreach, love, and service of God and neighbor. Bishop Galante says that as a shepherd he is to animate, call, and lead people to that understanding of faith. He is to help people to know Jesus more intimately and love Jesus more ardently.
  • I have only two things to say about this: (1) We do not intend to have this be a "silent spring." We do not trust in the type of "renewal" Galante wishes to impose. We will fight the destruction of our Church, our churches, and our Faith and will not do so quietly. (2) As our "shepherd," I would truly like to know how the bishop is leading us toward a love and knowledge of Jesus. I certainly don't see it. By closing our beloved houses of God, how is this helping us?

6. Bishop Galante said that young people hunger for deeper meaning in their lives.
  • Of course this is true! But then why would he want to close houses of God that young people are attached to and that in many cases their ancestors built? In a society that increasingly destroys places of significance in favor of generic strip malls, developments, and chain stores, why would a bishop want to impose more of the same? South Jersey has been colonized by forces that seek to destroy its character for long enough. Why would young people or any people support the destruction of the place where they have come to know and love Our Lord? Why should he want to destroy churches that radiate traditional Catholic culture and values and erect nondescript McChurches like we see elsewhere in the country (and sadly, even within our own diocese)? Does Bishop Galante have any idea how devastating something like that can be to any person? Some are so disgusted by what's going on they are considering leaving the church altogether. I know young adults who have left the church and what Bishop Galante is doing in closing churches just seals the deal, so to speak. Places are important, the places we worship in are important, and they are not so easily replaced.
  • If Bishop Galante will look to numbers with complete objectivity, he will clearly see that diocese, orders, and fraternities that are attracting young adults are disproportionately ones that are traditional, which is the very thing Galante wishes to undercut. Here are several links to just a handful of such groups. There are certainly lots of others:
  • Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter stats page (Their regular page)--They send priests throughout the country when the bishop allows them in. This is what they were set up to do. The FSSP priests are not just in one particular place.
  • Nashville Dominicans
  • Dominican Sisters of Mary Mother of the Eucharist

7. Bishop Galante always likes to say that he spent so much time "listening to the people" during the "speak out sessions" and deanery meetings, claiming the process (as well as the closures he thinks were a natural emination of that process) has lay support.
  • No one I know is in support of the mergers and closures. Not a single person. People think that the loss of their houses of God is inevitable and that there is nothing they can do about it. This assumption of inevitability must NOT be construed as support!
  • We all know that we must be careful when evaluating "studies" done by organizations that have an agenda. The diocese is no exception. As Leah and Bob pointed out in the video response, this is a fake "process" and the studies and polls that are cited are almost always fake as well. We can make numbers say whatever we want and make studies prove whatever we want by structuring them in certain ways. No diocesan study ought to be trusted. Interestingly, as Leah Vassallo pointed out, there has been no poll on parish mergers because no one supports them.
  • Bishop Galante is taking advantage of the Catholic faithful's trust of their bishop--trust that he cares for them, listens to them,and is leading them along the right and godly path. Instead, he is abusing their trust by taking away from them something that is most precious because he has an particular agenda. This is an abuse of his power. The closing of half the churches in our diocese is absolutely wrong and must be resisted.

8. Bishop Galante claims that he supports and desires priestly vocations.
  • In reality, the bishop is actively discouraging priestly vocations. He has (1) lowered the mandatory retirement age, (2) refused priests from outside the diocese (Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter, Indian Carmelites, African priests, and others, only to import one of the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales in order to bolster his own liberal agenda), (3) spread seminarians among three seminaries, and (4) reassigned, forced out, or forced into retirement more than a dozen priests to date.
  • Why is he discouraging vocations to the priesthood? Two interconnected reasons. While it is bizarre to think any "shepherd" would do this, it is simply fact that with the diminishing availability of priests comes the scarcity of the sacraments. Without the sacraments to strengthen us in the spiritual life, we are in trouble! Instead of encouraging and inviting priests who make available the sacraments, Galante has a lay-led initiative ready to implement, which will begin with lay staff at each parish. The hiring of all the lay staff will likely cost each parish, according to the diocese' own salary scale, somewhere in the vicinity of $200,000 each year in addition to their normal operating costs. The bottom line is that Galante wishes to change the character of the Church altogether.

9. Bishop Galante has repeatedly stressed the importance of offering social services to people in the hopes that they'll come to church. (The "build it and they will come" mentality.) Services like day care for seniors and children, to start with.
  • Church isn't about convenience, it's about fatih. While services are nice, do we really want to encourage a view of the Church in which people assume a relationship of convenience and comfort? The bishop is coming about this whole thing backwards. We need to build up the spirituality of the churches first and foremost, and if services are needed or wanted, they must be connected to that spirituality. Without Christ at our center, all services, as good as they may be, will be superficial and will not draw people to Him.

On the Newsmakers coverage:
In my opinion, CBS 3 has certainly given the movement excellent coverage in the past and I know they will in the future. The most recent news piece was extremely good. However I must admit I personaly did not think Pat Ciarrocchi challenged the bishop, nor would I consider the bishop's stint on Newsmakers an example of balanced journalism. It was obviously pretty one-sided. In fact, I was disappointed to see she even fed Bishop Galante answers at various points. It was really great, though, when she pointed out the "tremendous resistence" to his plan, and the bishop took issue with the word "tremendous." In any case, I know that CBS normally has wonderfully balanced coverage of this issue and I certainly anticipate more critical analysis of the diocesan crisis going into the future.

Pre-Recorded live 6/23:

Pre-Announcement:

This Sunday June 22 at 8:15 am, Bishop Galante will be interviewed on Newsmakers with Pat Ciarrocchi on Channel 3 (KYW-CBS). Several from the COP will respond!

Tune in here at savestmarys.net at 8:00 am Sunday (tomorrow) to watch live.

More:
Diocesan spokesperson Andrew Walton says, "Bishop will appear on Sunday's CBS3 Newsmaker's program between 8:00 AM and 8:30 AM.  He will discuss parish planning and other topics in a 10 minute segment."

Since the bishop will be afforded this opportunity to express his views without contest, leaders of the Council of Parishes of Southern NJ (COP) will respond in real time, online, by webcam/blog. Those interested will be able to see and hear the response of the COP as well as read commentary.

After all, we feel that Bishop Galante is a "catalyst who will bring the laity in to share responsibility," and that is precisely what we are trying to do--share responsibility. In a "community of equals" it is necessary to "provide a sense of openness and ownership for everyone." (I am, of course, quoting Bishop Galante.)

True Motivation of the Merger Process:
It's Financial

by An Anonymous Contributor
(hey, if the Catholic Star Herald can have anonymous writers, so
can we!)


The Catholic Star Herald recently published the following Q&A on
its webpage further explaining the merger process as Galante
would have it happen.

Read it here.

What the answer fails to include, however, is that the Bishop
is ordering these "Priest Conveners," as their very first
duty upon appointment, to take an ENTIRE INVENTORY OF THE
PARISH
. He's apparently concerned with preventing theft.
(Seriously, this is the exact reason he provides for ordering
these inventories!) This is ironic since he keeps saying the
mergers are about "vibrancy," but his very first directive
with respect to the mergers is clearly MATERIAL in nature.


As if we're too simple to see past his patronizing one-
dimensional answers, Galante has brushed aside our concerns by
explaining that parish assets don't belong to the diocese. Well
if it's not his plan to have his new parish priests sell all
the assets and funnel the $$$ back to the diocese to create the
ultimate legacy (of his ego), then why is he so concerned with
trying to protect his (OUR!) possessions from theft by the
faithful? Which concern is, in itself, so telling about his
notions of spirituality!


__________________________________________________________

6/22 Editorial Note:
Although it may be true that Canon law makes necessary the
inventory of all material goods of a parish, the point of the
above writer is well-taken. The material aspect of this
"reconfiguration" is over-emphasized.

On multiple occasions the bishop has spoken about the assets
of particular parishes and emphasized his role as being over
the entire diocese. A parish with significant funds and/or
property will eventually be "merged" with another parish that
does not. After that time, the first parish will cease to exist
as an entity, but because it was "merged" rather than suppressed,
the money is still usable.

In other words, it is clear that assets of parishes not in
arrears will be used (at least in part) to "bail out" parishes
that are. Take for example the case of Our Lady Queen of Peace
in Pitman and Our Lady of Lourdes. Bishop Galante wishes to
merge these two churches. The former parish has significant
assets, the latter is in debt. While the bishop may be
concerned about theft from the diocese on some level, what's
really going on is pure and simple theft from parishes by the
diocese. The bishop wishes to legitimately seize
assets from parishes for the benefit of the diocese. If the
church doesn't have cash assets, they may be strategically
located on potentially valuable real estate. I can think of
many such parishes off the top of my head. In the end, who knows
what will really happen to these funds.

Further we see multiple rationales given for the
"reconfiguration"--an eventual priest shortage,
demographic shifts [evidence please ???], lack of funds, and a
need for slick, paid "ministries," the need to strengthen or
"revitalize" the diocese, whatever happens to be the
"rationale du jour. Financial difficulties are often on
the list. The bishop and Msgr. McGrath still are able to dig deep
and find--without apparent problem--five MILLION dollars to buy
land for a new high school that will cost tens of millions of
dollars.

Meanwhile, he shutters our beloved churches and schools
and ups the "Appeal" goals for most parishes to astronomical levels.
He makes demeaning comments in a television interview quipping
that parents want a "quality" education for their children,
clearly implying that the schools he chose to close did not
provide "quality" educations. Those poor teachers must feel
horrible to receive such a put-down for their years of service.
But to Galante, the more money you can throw at a school or parish,
the better the "quality."

The point? Money's a huge motivator. Unfortunately that old
saying my dad used to quote all the time still holds true:
"Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." It's
such a shame that this is happening in the Church Christ founded.
No, in fact, it's embarrasing.
Link here if you want to waste your time. More of the same. What a shame some people might actually believe this stuff.

For example:

Of the 124 parishes in the diocese currently, only one has a full-time, paid youth minister. Many parishes, as presently configured, lack the means to add the full-complement of paid, professional ministry positions that would be necessary to address the needs that the people themselves have identified as most pressing.

Paid staff="better ministry." I fail to see the logic. In addition, the diocese tries to disown the term "megachurch" by designating it a protestant term. Then why in the world is he closing all the small churches? Why does he hold up for example large churches? The bottom line is, for Bishop Galante, bigger is better and money=quality. How sad. Bishop, where does God fit into your plans? Does Our Lord play a role in all this?

(Article by "a Star Herald writer." All these uncredited articles remind me of what the Jehovah's Witnesses do in the Watchtower publication: watchtower.)

This article has little to do, directly, with the campaign, but it definitely reveals the mindset of those Galante and McGrath surround themselves with. Like Ms. vollmer, formerly of LA and then Dallas, of "it's a process, not a program" fame. Liberals love "process," let me tell you. It makes things appear to be in flux rather than a set plan. But I digress.

Funny thing, I wasn't aware that the "social Gospel" was the "one and only Gospel." I just thought the Gospel was the Truth, the message of salvation, the Word of God, the Good News...the Gospel. Bizarre.

Funnier thing, I do consider myself a "liberal" when it comes to social programs and things, yet I don't at all relate to this rhetoric. Making political (ie something secular, worldly, and generally icky) the Sacred Heart of Our Lord is just not my thing. The implication here, to my mind, is that Jesus and St. Benedict were sort of proto-Marxists. They did Marxism better. Ummm...ok? I guess I just don't get it. I think of Our Lord as my Savior, the One who leads us unto all Truth, not a political figure.

Reminds me of St. John the Evangelist Parish in Naples, FL that Bishop Galante wants to model the new "Church of South Jersey" after. They'd love this stuff. (More on St.John the Evangelist parish here.)

Snippet from Fr. Gregorio's article (emphasis mine):

Priests and deacons preaching the social Gospel (i.e., the one and only Gospel) often are accused of siding with one party or one economic school, even failed ones like Marxism. They should reply that Jesus came before Marx, and that Marx inadvertently borrowed from the rule of Benedict and how Benedictine monasteries run: classless society, ownership of the means of production by the proletariat, no private property, etc. However a monk is always free to leave the community while one may not leave communist China.

Beware of the old rubbish being resurrected about the evils of liberalism. Many damn this leftward slant because of its squishy tolerance of sexual hedonism but ignore its thrust to use government to raise the minimal standard of living of the nation's disadvantaged, most of whom by serious analysis are where they are because of an economic system flawed so badly it would break a bleeding heart.

Unite to oppose Galante's plan


Bishop Joseph Galante of the Diocese of Camden had a dream that went something like this:

Let's build a new regional elementary school and put it out in the woods. Then we can get parishes like Saint Nicholas in Egg Harbor City to help pay for the cost of construction and maintenance. Let's assess Saint Nicholas parish $1,100 per week for upkeep and $400,000 as its share of construction. We'll let the current Saint Nicholas pastor return to being a military chaplain so a new pastor can be appointed who will cooperate with the plan to close the current parochial school and merge Saint Nicholas with a new Church of the Assumption parish. After a while, people won't mind making the 20-mile round trip to another church.

Is this a dream or a nightmare?

Does Bishop Galante think we parishioners are dumb? Stand up and oppose this "dream" before it becomes a reality. Whether you are a parishioner of Saint Nicholas or one of the other parishes in the Diocese of Camden, don't rest until Bishop Galante's dream has been foiled. Your parish could be next.

THOMAS McGEARY SR.

Egg Harbor City

Click here to read online.

Channel 3 Covers Us!

Excellent coverage (scroll down for link!). Apparently KYW3 (CBS) contacted the Council of Parishes and St. Mary's Malaga in connection to the new multi, multi-million dollar high school the bishop wishes to build. The news media--with no help from us--is making the connection between church closures and big spending. Seems like we hardly have to contact them anymore; they've begun coming to us, and there is no shortage of stories. Since there is obviously a widespread interest in the diocesan mess, the media are wise to print and air these stories.

We are grateful to the reporters who are presenting our side of the story and are truly striving for an objective representation of the situation. We believe an objective point-of-view clearly reveals the injustice and horror that is being perpetrated. Thanks are certainly in order for CBS, ABC, Fox, The Courier Post, The Press of Atlantic City, The New York Times, The Gloucester County Times, and others for refusing to settle for a one-sided view of the predicament as it is presented by diocesan officials.

In this video, the holiness of our dear pastor, Fr. Romanowski, comes through as always, as does the smugness of a less-than-sympathetic Bishop Galante. Boy, Galante just makes himself look worse and worse on his own since his attitude is so poor. On one hand, what a shame this whole thing is happening. Yet on the other hand, as it was pointed out to me last night by a friend, it is our privilege to defend the Church and the Truth. She's right. In the struggle we hope to grow closer to Our Lord.

Watch video here.

Priest Personnel Changes

"Funny that in our 'shortage' we can continue to afford to send priests
out of the diocese," comments the person who sent me a link to this
piece in the CSH.

Catholic Star Herald article here

It is interesting that amid all the proposed church closures and crying poor, Bishop Galante,  Msgr McGrath, Ms. vollmer, and other diocesan bureaucrats have seen fit to add so many paid "ministry" positions for their modernist church-of-tomorrow (see below). Where are they going to get all these funds? Hmmmm. As we have discussed earlier, this is part of a larger agenda to downplay the role of the priest, the importance of the sacraments, and traditional Catholic religiosity. They seek instead to elevate the role of the laity to perform what pught to be priestly functions.

Here's another interesting thought. With fewer priests and parishes, it is likely that control will be concentrated among only a few in the chancery offices. An anonymous source has informed us that the notion of a priestly dorm has been floated. A centrally located dormitory for all the priests of the diocese to live in communally would replace local rectories, with priests commuting to their respective parishes for weekend "liturgies," occasional sacraments, and any other necessary duties that may only be done by a priest. Day-to-day administration of the parishes would be handled by the laity. Remember, it's also easier to hire and fire laypeople. With laypeople in place, there's no messy Canon law to contend with, or what to do with and where to put a priest the bishop may want to be rid of.

Need a job? Take a gander, then send your resume off to Camden. (For job descriptions, just click here and scroll down to the "ministry roles" pdf: "Gathering God's Gifts")

Liturgy
• Director of Liturgy
• Director of Music
• Director of Music and Liturgy

Lifelong Faith Formation
• Director for Religious Education (DRE)
• Coordinator for Religious Education (CRE)
• Assistant for Religious Education (ARE)
• Coordinator of Sacraments
• Coordinator of RCIA
• Spiritual Formation Director
• Spiritual Formation Coordinator
 
Youth and Young Adults
• Young Adult Director (large parish, or coordinates several parishes)
• Young Adult Leader (small or mid-size parish)
• Youth Minister Director (large parish, or coordinates several parishes)
• Youth Ministry Leader (small or mid-size parish)
 
Parish Leadership and Lay Ecclesial Ministry
• Director of Parish Life
• Pastoral Associate
• Business Administrator

Compassionate Outreach
• Coordinator of Evangelization
• Social Outreach Coordinator

Other Ministries The demand for ministry varies in accord with needs of the parish community.There is a potential and a desire for creating new ministries, e.g. Coordinator of Pastoral Care may work with specific groups such as parish nurses, shut-ins, bereavement groups, etc.

Salary Guidelines for Planning

Now unless I missed something, you may notice if you check out the diocese website that the "Salary Guidelines for Planning" section is mysteriously missing! Please do let me know if I missed it--that's possible. However I have been told that the full-time positions would all be over $50,000/year and roughly comparable to a priest's salary. Guess I ought to switch careers. Homemaking isn't very lucrative, but I can always throw my kids in daycare and go become a diocesan lackey, umm, I mean "minister." When all is said and done, we may have no more seminarians because a godly man would have to be crazy to come to this diocese, and we may have few priests left because so many were sent away or "reassigned," but we'll have the best "ministry" and, likely, the ugliest churches money can buy.
How sad is this? The diocese is rewarding young people who wrote essays talking about how their churches aren't really that important. They are teaching the kids that the house where the Eucharistic Presence of our Lord resides and the Gospel is preached is basically just a building. While our Faith is indeed more than a building, the place where we worship God is important. If our church buildings weren't important, Bishop Galante wouldn't be so anxious to close them all, would he?

By the way, St. Edward's in Pine Hill, mentioned below, is the church that the beautiful Mater Ecclesiae is (was) a mission of. What a shame. Enlisting children in the spread of propaganda is the oldest trick in the book. Those of us raised in the wake of Vatican II should know. I pray that there will be something left of the Catholic faith in South Jersey for these kids and for all of us.

_____________________________________________________

Young Catholic Leader scholarships presented
Published by Star Herald Writer  
Thu, June 12 2008

Brenna Frick of St. Lawrence Regional School, Lindenwold, first place winner of the David  T. Coghlan Young Catholic Leader scholarship, is congratulated by Msgr. William P.Graham, pastor of St. Lawrence Parish, and Kathryn Coghlan.
'The church is much more than a building'

I am a member of St. Edward Parish in Pine Hill. My belief is that the church is one of the most important things in my life. On Sundays, I help my mom sell grocerey certificates after Mass. I believe that all Catholics should attend Mass weekly. One thing that I am realizing, with the possibility of my church closing and being merged with another church, is that the church is much more than a building that we attend every Sunday. The Catholic family is much more than one parish -- it is a community of many different people worldwide sharing one strong belief. The greatest contribution that I can give to my church is to be a supportive part of it and to trust in God.

-- From Brenna Frick's winning essay

Link to Catholic Star Herald article here

Msgr. Mannion reassigned

Msgr. Mannion, who up until now was pastor of the Cathedral in Camden, is being reassigned to make way for the bishop's pal from the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales (outside the diocese). Wouldn't it make logical sense to appoint a pastor for the Cathedral who's an actual diocesan priest? At least Msgr. Mannion is going to remain within the Diocese of Camden.

Catholic Star Herald link here

What's next for Assumption Wildwood Crest? More from Corinne Robinson. Keep fighting the good fight! Click here.
Snippet:

"Galante spoke for over ten minutes, and was interrupted numerous times by the unhappy crowd, about the reasoning from the decision, but never gave any inclination that he might reverse his decision..."

Click here to read article.

Thank you again, Coastal Broadcasting News. Good work.

There is an interview with Corinne Robinson of Assumption Wildwood and a second with diocesan spokesperson Andrew Walton. May God bless Coastal Broadcasting News for its good work. Thank you!

Listen online here. Address is http://coastalbroadcastingnews.blogspot.com/2008/06/reaction-to-what-bishop-galante-had-to.html.
Notice so many spearheading the movement to save our Faith from immanent destruction are under 50, even under 40. Here's an article that explains why.

Here's a snippet (for more read the entire article below). Catholic leaders are saying that:

"Young people are leaving the Church in droves because of its refusal to conform to the times!" As a young person, I tell you this is rubbish.  It is a smokescreen.  I do not dispute that there are many young, "enlightened" Catholics who have left the Church with these reasons on their lips.  But they are using these reasons as excuses to mask the real problem:  They have either lost their faith or they never really had it.  The need in this case is not for accommodation, but for conversion.  These young Catholics have never been taught that Christianity is not about self-fulfillment, it's about self-denial; it's not about worldly power, it's about humility; it's not about control, it's about obedience; and it's not about some misguided, gender feminist idea of equality, it's about Truth.


I Was Robbed!
by Leila Miller
    

I was robbed.

I am a "Generation X" Catholic, raised and catechized in the tumultuous aftermath of Vatican II.  I was a victim of "renewal" and experimentation gone awry, and so were my peers.  With great regret and without exaggeration, I contend that the results have been catastrophic for my generation.  It is my firm belief that the overwhelming majority of young Catholics don't have even an elemental understanding of their Faith.  As a direct result of that ignorance, young Catholics are leaving the Church in a steady stream (or, dare I say, tidal wave?).

It's not entirely accurate to say that I left the Catholic Church (though I considered it), but it's clear to me now that for most of my young adulthood, I was not in the Catholic Church.  Let me give you an overview of my upbringing, which will sound familiar to countless young Catholics.  I was born in the late 1960s into a believing and practicing Catholic family, and my sister and I were taught by our parents to love our Faith.  Barring illness, we attended Sunday Mass and holy days of obligation without exception.  We attended public schools, but we were enrolled in weekly CCD classes at our parish every year.

By the time I began religious education, memorizing the Baltimore Catechism was out, and feeling the "experience of Christ" was in.  My parish priest, I believe, could not have known how the new, more "enlightened" philosophy of catechism would affect the moral development of those in his charge; at the time, he was simply caught up in the so-called "spirit of Vatican II," and was being obedient to what were considered Vatican II "mandates."  Meanwhile, my parents, like the other parents, trusted that religious education classes would teach us the Faith.  Sadly, that never happened.

In general, the volunteer CCD teachers were good-hearted parishioners who probably tried their best with the vacuous material they were given.  Looking back, I can see that a couple of them must have been alarmed at the "new and improved" methods, and wanted to teach us the fundamentals of our Faith; for example, one year a teacher made us memorize the Ten Commandments; another year (9th or 10th grade, I believe) I heard the word transubstantiation for the first and last time.  Aside from these rare moments, I assure you that precious little substantive information was imparted to us youngsters; the countless hours I spent in religious education were missed opportunities.

I can tell you in three phrases the content of a decade of catechesis:  God is good, Jesus loves you, and love your neighbor.  (All very good and true, don't get me wrong, but if you read your Bible you'll see that that's only half the Gospel.  And sometimes half of the truth is more treacherous than an outright lie.)  We were shown a lot of cartoon slide shows depicting Jesus and his parables, and I have nice images of multiplying loaves, the Good Samaritan, and Jesus' empty tomb.  I don't remember anything particularly Catholic about the presentations, aside from a foray into the sacraments when it was time for First Communion or Confirmation.  (But if you'd have asked me to explain what a sacrament was, I couldn't have told you.)

We weren't taught any Catholic prayers, although we all knew the Our Father from Mass attendance, and in my case from nightly prayers.  I learned the Hail Mary along the way, but for many years I knew only the first half.  We never discussed the lives of the saints, or even mentioned their names for that matter.  (Sitting at Mass, I could never figure out who this "Paul" fellow was who wrote so many letters!)

I am thankful at least that I was born before the last vestiges of Catholic tradition could be stamped out, and in the 1970s some of the more pious and beautiful hymns were still often included in the Mass.  Songs like The Church's One Foundation, Immaculate Mary, and At That First Eucharist were powerful to a child, and they have stuck with me to this day.  The dramatic, colorful Bible story books I read at home also presented an unshakable image of a just and mighty God and his glorious and majestic Son.  These haunting melodies and images, combined with my parents' faith and the common themes of my religious education did instill some important truths in my heart:  I never wavered in my belief in God Almighty and in the Incarnation, Death and Resurrection of His Son.  Just who or what the Holy Spirit was or did was anybody's guess, although I did recognize that the Holy Spirit was one of the Persons of the Trinity -- whatever that meant.  (I believe this particular bit of knowledge came from the repetition of another traditional hymn, which spoke of "God in three Persons, Blessed Trinity."  Since traditional hymns are no longer sung on a regular basis, I can only surmise that young Catholics today are learning less than I did!)

I went through my school years believing I was a strong Catholic -- in fact, as I got older I would often identify myself as "devout" -- and after my high school graduation I chose to attend a Jesuit university, in part to increase my chances of meeting and marrying a nice Catholic man and raising children in a strong Catholic home.  I made many Catholic friends during my years at Boston College, many of whom were products of Catholic elementary and high schools and most of whom were, like me, practicing Catholics. Just touching on this subject brings up many difficult emotions in me, but it is hard to overstate the tragedy occurring at most Catholic universities across the country -- namely, the betrayal of  parents entrusting a child to a college that identifies itself as "Catholic" while it allows and even encourages fiercely anti-Catholic beliefs and practices to permeate the campus and poison impressionable minds.  I do not know one Catholic who grew in his or her Faith at B.C.  Indeed, many who entered Boston College as practicing Catholics graduated indifferent or hostile to Catholicism.  I assure you that Satan is having a good time at B.C. and universities like it.  Though modern sensibilities may scoff at this notion, I don't mean it metaphorically.

Anyway, to give you an idea what all of those years of religious training and formation amounted to, allow me to throw out a short list of terms that, for my first 28 years, had no meaning to me:

Sacred Tradition Mass Cards
Scapular 
Sanctifying Grace Benediction Pentecost
Magisterium Act of Contrition Four Marks of the Church
Sacramentals The "Glory Be"
Joyful/Sorrowful/Glorious Mysteries
Corporal Works of Mercy  Apostolic Succession Four Last Things
Indulgences
Perpetual Adoration Spiritual Works of Mercy

In my experience, most Catholics of my generation are unable to explain or even recognize the above.  And to follow are some terms that may sound familiar to my post-Vatican II peers, but that they don't understand correctly and/or believe for a second:

Purgatory  Communion of Saints Papal Infallibility
Transubstantiation Mortal and Venial Sin Immaculate Conception


The attitudes of my Catholic peers are no mystery.  Confession?  Sure, great sacrament -- I'll get there one of these years (wink, wink).  No pre-marital sex?  No artificial contraception?  Yeah right, get real!  Evangelize?  Are you kidding?  Why?  After all, Buddhism, Islam, New Age, Christianity -- they're all equal paths to God.  Who are Catholics to say they have the truth?  A mature spirituality requires the understanding that everyone can be right!

In general, Generation X Catholics don't feel any obligation to live as the Church teaches, and I promise you that they do not fear the fires of Hell, nor do they believe in Purgatory.  (But really, how could they?  They've gone to Mass faithfully for decades and never heard such topics discussed, much less defended!)

The culture we live in is merciless when it comes into contact with a poorly catechized Catholic.  American society today is designed to destroy one's faith, as objective truth and moral absolutes are rejected concepts.  When modern, "enlightened"
catechesis echoes the messages of the culture, and when those charged with informing the Catholic conscience and transmitting the Faith take an "experiential" rather than informative approach, what can you expect?  You can expect exactly what was taught.You can expect young Catholics who believe "conscience" means "opinion" and you can expect subjective feelings and personal experience to supplant objective truth.  In fact, the prevailing philosophy of my peers is that there is no one "truth" -- truth is whatever we want it to be.  You have your truth, I have mine.  (Kind of puts the lie to Christ's definitive statement, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life" doesn't it?  It also doesn't sound like anything worth dying for -- those silly martyrs!)

We reap what we sow, and when pop-psychology all but replaces sound catechesis the results should not surprise anyone.  The practices and beliefs of my circle of Catholic friends tell a sad story.  Pre-marital sex?  Yes, with a series of different partners.  Contraception?  Of course -- it's a virtue.  Living together, a.k.a. living in sin?  It's a non-issue.  (One Catholic friend did go so far as to find a "compassionate" priest who consented to give her absolution before she moved in with a man!)  Active homosexuality?  A lifestyle choice.  Abortion?  Sad, and we don't like it, but it's a woman's private decision -- too bad her partner didn't use a condom.

Most of my Catholic friends attend Mass sporadically or not at all.  Some get their spiritual guidance from gender feminism (which is a fiercely anti-Catholic movement) and/or New Age philosophies. Overall, the Catholic call to holiness is an unfamiliar concept to them, and I do not for a moment attempt to exempt myself from this scrutiny.  Confession is a sacrament that was never emphasized (I made my first Confession at nine years of age while sitting on a priest's lap), and after my first couple of confessions during grade school, I never went back; I shudder when I think of how often I received Holy Communion unworthily.

So how is it that a Catholic who went to Mass every Sunday and went through all the proper catechism programs at her church could continue on unconcerned while carrying several serious sins on her soul?  I do not offer this as an excuse for doing wrong, but you must understand my actions in the context of what I was taught.  My generation of Catholics grew up with a keen understanding of God's infinite love for us.  We knew that His mercy could not be exhausted, no matter how badly we behaved.  But at the same time, we heard almost nothing about God's justice.  That while God is perfectly merciful, He is also perfectly just.  Somehow, that part was lost, or suppressed.  I guess no one wanted to hurt our feelings with Church teaching; for example, that by persisting in serious, unrepented sins, we could damn ourselves to an eternity in Hell.

Jesus said, "Enter through the narrow gate.  The gate that leads to damnation is wide, the road is clear, and many choose to travel it.  But how narrow is the gate that leads to life, how rough the road, and how few there are who find it!" (Matt 7:13-14)  Jesus mentions Hell over a dozen times in the Gospels, but our teachers and priests only presented us with the Jesus of the Beatitudes, or the Jesus who continuously forgave sinners.  We were never reminded that Jesus forgave repentant sinners, those with contrite hearts and the intention to sin no more.

The God presented to American Catholics today is the Rodney Dangerfield of gods:  He gets no respect.  Today, God hardly needs to be worshipped, since He's our buddy, our pal, our equal.  No need to fear Him or stand in awe, no difficult obligations on our part -- we need only feel the warm fuzzies He showers upon us, until we die and He takes us instantly to Heaven.

Such was the image that my generation got of God our Father.  But what would we say of any other father who asks no obedience, forgives every sin unconditionally and automatically, with no requirement for an apology or recompense?  We would call him a wimp, a pushover, a sap, a fool.  Good and loving parents don't reward bad behavior and disobedience.  They set down boundaries that a child, for his own good, must not cross.  Should that child choose to persist in disobedience and wrong-doing, good parents don't expand the boundaries to encompass his bad behavior, they hold firm and hope for his repentance precisely because they desire his happiness and success.  They do not cease to love him, even as they let him experience the consequences of his poor choices.  Such it is with God and sinful man.  He loves us infinitely, but He cannot force us to love and obey Him against our free will.  None of this was explained to post-Vatican II Catholics.

Although many of my peers will leave the Church and Christianity altogether, many will do as I did.  That is, I never once considered forsaking Christianity, nor did I question Christ's divinity (I felt strongly that to deny Christ would be blasphemous and a sacrilege).  But I was guilty of presumption.  I thought that because of my "deep faith" I could continue in one or another mortal sin and God would forgive me, or make an exception on my behalf.  I just knew he would respect my "conscience!"

I never did disagree with the Church's stand on controversial issues such as abortion or homosexuality.  I had even heard, almost by accident, some of the Church's arguments against artificial contraception, and they made sense to me.  I thought the Church was probably right on this issue (how magnanimous of me!), but of course I could never be expected to actually go along with this teaching!  I did plan to learn Natural Family Planning one day, sure, but certainly not now, in my young married years.  After all, God understands.

Though I presumed on God's mercy, I still believed in moral absolutes, and I never went the way of moral relativism; in fact, another young mother and I spent a year and a half writing an editorial column for our state's largest newspaper in which we rejected moral relativism and defended the concept of objective truth.  This friend, Kim, had spent six years as a gender feminist and New Ager, but motherhood combined with writing our column eventually led her back to Christianity and into a local Bible church.              (Read Kim's story here)

Kim had been a lapsed Episcopalian and I was a waning Catholic, so we had never really had religious discussions until then; but because of my strong belief in an objective right and wrong, I was attracted to what she was telling me about the Bible church.  These evangelicals stood firm on moral issues and were not afraid of offending anyone with Christian moral truths.  I couldn't say as much for the Catholic parish I was sporadically attending, where moral courage was sadly lacking and politically correct sermons and liturgies were the norm.  A Church that sought to blend in with the culture was not the kind of religious community I wanted.  I was raising children in a scary society, and I needed support from others who believed as I did and who would be a refuge from the "pagan world."  In my disgust with what American Catholicism had become, I flirted with the idea of leaving it for the Bible church.

Let me back up here and fill in some details.  Shortly after I graduated college, I became engaged to Dean Miller, a nice agnostic Jewish boy (so much for my attempts to find a Catholic husband!).  My identity as a Catholic was strong enough that I had come to this relationship with certain non-negotiables:  I would never get married outside the Church, and any children of mine would be baptized and raised Catholic.  Dean (who, ironically, attended a Catholic high school) respectfully and unselfishly agreed to my conditions, and we were married a year later in a Catholic church by my childhood priest.

Over the next four years, I gave birth to three beautiful babies.  As you might imagine, this provided me with any number of excuses for not going to Mass on Sundays, and almost never on holy days.  Of course, when one does not understand what takes place during the Mass, it is easy to become lax about attending.  During those years, I lived in two major cities and had done a bit of "church-hopping," trying to find a parish I liked.  I became disillusioned by the seemingly endless (and lame) attempts to make the Mass "hip" and entertaining.  All of the hand-holding, applauding, trite songs and political correctness was a monumental turn-off for me.  I felt no reverence, no awe; there was nothing in these Masses to snap me to attention, to take me out of myself and focus my mind and heart up to God in His Heaven.  I wasn't "getting anything out of it."  (Like so many others, I did not fully comprehend that one doesn't go to Mass to "get something out of it" -- one goes to worship God.)  When I did get myself to church, I felt as if I were "putting in my time," mechanically fulfilling an obligation.  I often ducked out right after Communion.

Because I was raised to never miss Mass, I felt guilty for skipping it so often (as well I should have, considering the gravity of the sin!).  I half-teasingly blamed Dean for my not getting to church, but he wouldn't let me get away with such scapegoating.  He and I knew I had no one but myself to blame.  Though my actions were inexcusable, allow me once again to explain my state of mind during these years.  I had grown up in a culture that had, with amazing rapidity and nonchalance, thrown all of the old value systems out the window.  Nothing was sure and eternal anymore, and it had gradually become unacceptable to believe in a right and wrong.  The idea of sin was dee